How Referral Partners Decide Between Home Health and SNFs — and What Wins the Site-of-Care Referral

Referral partners are becoming more deliberate about whether patients should receive care at home or in an SNF. This article explains the documentation, outcomes data, caregiver assessment, capacity, and communication practices that influence site-of-care decisions. It also shows how durable referral relationships can improve operations today while supporting stronger buyer underwriting and exit readiness. For home health or hospice owners, the goal is not to accept every referral, but to become the provider partners trust to execute safely.

9/3/20268 min read

Editorial illustration showing a care coordinator connecting a patient’s home with a skilled nursing
Editorial illustration showing a care coordinator connecting a patient’s home with a skilled nursing

Referral partners are under increasing pressure to place patients in the safest and most appropriate setting after hospitalization. This article explains how hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, health plans, and discharge planners compare home health with SNFs, and what agency owners can do to win more durable referrals.

Quick-Scan Summary
Who this is for

This article is for owners and operators of home health or hospice agencies with approximately $2 million to $10 million in annual revenue who want to:

  • Increase referrals from hospitals, SNFs, health plans, and discharge planners

  • Improve patient acceptance and start-of-care speed

  • Strengthen documentation and outcomes reporting

  • Reduce avoidable readmission risk

  • Build referral relationships that support long-term business value

  • Prepare for a future sale, succession plan, or partnership with Senate Healthcare

Key takeaways
  • Referral partners do not choose home health based on availability alone. They evaluate clinical fit, caregiver support, communication, outcomes, and execution risk.

  • The “Friday night test” is a practical way to determine whether a patient can safely return home before the weekend.

  • Agencies that can prove outcomes, respond quickly, and communicate consistently are more likely to receive repeat referrals.

  • Referral durability can affect buyer underwriting, EBITDA quality, sale price, and the strength of an agency’s exit profile.

  • In 2026, a formal patient acceptance-to-service policy should reflect staffing, capacity, and clinical competencies.

Why Site-of-Care Decisions Matter

The choice between home health and a skilled nursing facility is not simply a question of patient preference or referral volume. It is a clinical and operational decision that can affect recovery, cost, caregiver stress, and the likelihood of hospital readmission.

A patient sent to an inappropriate site of care may not receive the level of support required to recover safely. If medications are unavailable, transportation is uncertain, the caregiver is overwhelmed, or home health services cannot begin promptly, a discharge that looked successful on paper may result in an avoidable return to the hospital.

A recent Home Health Care News report on site-of-care decisions described discussions from the PAYER Summit in June. Experts emphasized that the best decision combines:

  • Thorough clinical documentation

  • Communication among hospitals, SNFs, and home health providers

  • Outcomes data

  • Patient preferences

  • Caregiver support

  • Coordination of medications, transportation, equipment, and services

For home health or hospice owners, this creates an important distinction. The agency that merely accepts referrals may compete on availability. The agency that helps referral partners make safe, well-supported decisions becomes more valuable to the entire care network.

How Referral Partners Decide Between Home Health and SNFs
1. They start with clinical appropriateness

Home health can be the right setting for a patient who is medically stable and can safely receive intermittent skilled services at home. An SNF may be more appropriate when the patient requires a higher level of supervision, rehabilitation, nursing support, or monitoring than can reasonably be delivered through scheduled home visits.

The decision is not always clear. Arun Dahiya, principal of SNF innovation and advancement strategy at OneHome, described site-of-care transitions as “incredibly complex.” He also noted that patients often prefer to recover at home, but that home is not always a safe or realistic option.

OneHome works with health plans to coordinate home health, medical equipment, and infusions through a coordinated provider network. Its approach uses data to help determine where a patient should receive care, while also enabling providers to enter risk-based arrangements based on their size and healthcare interoperability.

The practical lesson for agency owners is straightforward: your referral partners need confidence that your agency understands both what it can handle and when another setting may be safer.

2. They evaluate the full discharge plan

A referral is not complete when a patient’s name appears in your intake queue. The referral partner is evaluating whether the entire transition will work.

That includes:

  • Whether the patient has a reliable caregiver

  • Whether the home environment is safe

  • Whether medications will be available

  • Whether ordered equipment has arrived

  • Whether transportation has been arranged

  • Whether the first home health visit is scheduled

  • Whether the patient and family understand whom to call

  • Whether the agency can respond if the patient’s condition changes

Brandi Cunagin, vice president of case management at Signature HealthCARE, described this evaluation as the “Friday night test”:

> “If I send a patient home on Friday at 4 p.m., am I comfortable that they’re going to have everything they need and not return to the hospital before Monday morning?”

The test focuses on support, medications, home health scheduling, and transportation. It is intentionally simple, but it exposes weak points that may not appear in a standard discharge checklist.

Your agency should be able to answer the same question before accepting a high-risk referral.

3. They consider patient circumstances, not just ideal pathways

Not every patient can be discharged to the optimal setting. Housing instability, limited family support, transportation barriers, financial pressure, and patient refusal can all affect the available options.

Referral partners want providers who can work within those realities without losing sight of safety. That may mean coordinating with community organizations, identifying an alternative caregiver, arranging equipment, escalating concerns early, or creating additional touchpoints after discharge.

For hospice agencies, the same principle applies. A family may want hospice care at home, but the agency must assess symptom burden, caregiver readiness, medication access, and the ability to respond to changing needs. A safe hospice admission depends on practical coordination as much as clinical eligibility.

What Wins More Site-of-Care Referrals
Flat illustration of a hospital discharge planner reviewing medications, transportation, home health
Flat illustration of a hospital discharge planner reviewing medications, transportation, home health
Documentation that supports the decision

Documentation should make it easy for a discharge planner or health plan to understand why home health is appropriate and how the plan of care addresses identified risks.

Train staff to consistently document:

  • Functional limitations and skilled needs

  • Medication risks and reconciliation issues

  • Caregiver availability and limitations

  • Home safety concerns

  • Patient and family preferences

  • Communication with physicians and referral partners

  • Escalation plans for changes in condition

  • The services required at start of care

For 2026, HHAs should maintain a formal and consistent patient acceptance-to-service policy based on staffing, capacity, geographic coverage, and clinical competencies. CMS guidance under QSO-26-13-HHA clarifies that HHAs must maintain a formal, consistent patient acceptance-to-service policy based on anticipated patient needs, caseload and case mix, staffing levels, and staff skills and competencies. The policy should reduce discharge delays while preventing the agency from accepting patients it cannot safely serve.

Outcomes data that can be understood quickly

Referral partners need more than a statement that your agency provides high-quality care. They need evidence.

Prepare a concise outcomes dashboard that can be reviewed by a hospital, SNF, or health plan executive. Depending on your service mix, track:

  • Hospital readmissions

  • Emergency department utilization

  • Timeliness of start of care

  • Visit completion

  • Patient experience

  • Medication-related escalations

  • Discharge-to-community success

  • Hospice symptom management and family satisfaction

  • Outcomes by payer, referral source, diagnosis, and service line

Dahiya encouraged providers to bring outcomes data and show the margin or spread between standard PDGM rates. His point was commercially important: agencies with superior outcomes may be able to support a payer renegotiation and potentially earn additional referral volume.

Quick-start capacity

A referral partner may remember your clinical reputation, but they will also remember whether you could start care when promised.

Create a daily capacity view that shows:

  • Open admissions by county or service area

  • Available nursing and therapy capacity

  • Weekend coverage

  • Same-day and next-day start capability

  • Referral response time

  • Average time from referral to first visit

  • Cases declined because of staffing or competency limitations

Do not promise immediate service if you cannot deliver it. A transparent acceptance process is more valuable than a high acceptance rate followed by delayed visits.

Communication that closes the loop

Referral partners want confirmation that the patient was accepted, scheduled, seen, and appropriately escalated if concerns emerged.

Set clear communication standards for:

  • Referral receipt

  • Acceptance or decline

  • Missing documentation

  • Start-of-care timing

  • Significant clinical changes

  • Missed visits

  • Hospital or emergency department transfers

  • Discharge from home health or hospice

This process should not depend entirely on the owner or one intake coordinator. Key-person dependence creates operational risk and can weaken valuation during buyer underwriting.

Use This Referral Scorecard
Why Referral Durability Matters in Valuation

A buyer does not evaluate revenue in isolation. During underwriting, the buyer will also examine how durable that revenue is, where it comes from, and how likely it is to continue if the owner steps away.

A home health or hospice agency with concentrated referrals, informal relationships, inconsistent intake, or weak outcomes reporting may receive a valuation haircut even when revenue appears strong. A diversified referral base supported by measurable outcomes and repeatable operating processes can reduce perceived risk.

Consider an illustrative scenario:

  • Agency revenue: $5 million

  • EBITDA margin: 12%

  • EBITDA: $600,000

  • Illustrative valuation at 4.0 times EBITDA: $2.4 million

Now assume the agency improves start-of-care execution, reduces avoidable referral leakage, strengthens documentation, and develops more durable referral relationships. If EBITDA improves to 15%, EBITDA becomes $750,000. If the buyer also views the agency as lower risk and applies an illustrative 4.5 times multiple, the resulting value would be $3.375 million.

That is a potential difference of $975,000. These are examples, not market guarantees, and actual multiples depend on payer mix, geography, margins, compliance, staffing, growth, concentration, and buyer fit. The point is that referral durability can influence both the earnings being valued and the multiple applied to those earnings.

Practical Action Plan for Marketing to Referral Partners
Flat illustration representing home health operations, referral communication, quick-start schedulin
Flat illustration representing home health operations, referral communication, quick-start schedulin

Owners should treat referral development as an operating discipline, not a separate marketing project.

In the next 30 days
  • Ask your top five referral partners what causes them to choose an SNF instead of home health.

  • Build a one-page outcomes and capacity summary.

  • Audit Friday admissions from the prior 90 days.

  • Identify cases delayed because of staffing, documentation, transportation, equipment, or caregiver gaps.

  • Confirm that your patient acceptance-to-service policy reflects current capabilities.

  • Assign a backup for every owner-dependent intake or referral relationship.

In the next 60 to 90 days
  • Schedule structured conversations with hospital discharge planners, SNF case managers, health plans, and physician offices.

  • Present outcomes by payer and referral source where the data is reliable.

  • Create a standard Friday afternoon transition checklist.

  • Establish escalation contacts for weekends and after-hours concerns.

  • Explore risk-based relationships only after you understand the reporting, interoperability, staffing, and margin requirements.

  • Track referral volume, acceptance rate, start-of-care timing, and readmissions by source.

The strongest marketing message is not “we accept everything.” It is “we know which patients we can serve safely, we can start when promised, and we can show what happens after admission.”

Plain-Language Glossary

Site of care: The setting where a patient receives services, such as home health, hospice, an SNF, or a hospital.

SNF: A skilled nursing facility that provides nursing care and rehabilitation in an inpatient setting.

PDGM: Medicare’s Patient-Driven Groupings Model, which determines payment for many home health episodes.

Risk-based arrangement: A payment relationship in which providers may share financial responsibility for patient outcomes, cost, or utilization.

Referral durability: The likelihood that referral volume will continue because it is supported by measurable performance and repeatable relationships.

Buyer underwriting: The process a buyer uses to evaluate an agency’s financial performance, operational risks, compliance, and future earnings potential.

So what should you do now?
  • Apply the Friday night test to every high-risk home health referral.

  • Make documentation, outcomes, caregiver support, and capacity visible to referral partners.

  • Replace owner-dependent referral relationships with repeatable communication processes.

  • Track the metrics that prove your agency can deliver safe transitions and durable results.

Senate Healthcare is evaluating acquisitions and strategic partnerships with home health or hospice agency owners who want to grow, plan succession, or explore a sale. We are the buyer and strategic partner, not a broker, agent, or advisor. If your agency is not perfectly positioned today, that does not mean the conversation should wait. A confidential discussion can help determine how to reduce operational risk, strengthen referral durability, and evaluate whether a future transaction with Senate Healthcare could support your goals.

Unlock Your 30-Minute Agency Succession Review

Maybe you're ready to expand your reach, or perhaps it's time to consider your legacy and the future of your business. Either way, it all begins with a conversation. Schedule a confidential, no-obligation call to explore what the future might hold for you and your business.

Complete the form, and we'll reach out for a chat...

© 2025 SENATE HEALTHCARE LLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED