CMS Just Put $275 Million Into Nursing Home Nurse Recruitment: What It Means for Home Health and Hospice Hiring

A new $275 million initiative offers eligible nurses financial support for a three-year commitment at qualifying nursing facilities. Home health and hospice agencies cannot access the program, but owners should understand what it could mean for local recruitment competition. An HHS OIG audit also offers a practical warning about the time and systems needed to collect detailed cost data. Here is how owners can prepare without confusing nursing facility rules with requirements that apply to home-based care.

10/29/20266 min read

An agency owner considers nursing recruitment across home care and nursing facilities.
An agency owner considers nursing recruitment across home care and nursing facilities.

CMS and all 50 states plus the District of Columbia have launched a $275 million initiative to recruit and retain nurses in nursing homes. For home health and hospice owners, the program is not a source of funding, but it is a reminder to understand how nearby employers compete for the same clinicians and why reliable cost data matters to buyers.

Quick-Scan Summary
Who this is for
  • Owners of home health or hospice agencies with $2 million to $10 million in revenue.

  • Operators hiring RNs and LPNs/LVNs in markets that include nursing facilities.

  • Owners considering a future sale or succession who want to improve workforce stability and financial reporting.

Key takeaways
  • The Nurses for Nursing Homes initiative offers eligible clinicians up to $40,000 in student loan repayment and/or a $10,000 stipend in exchange for a three-year commitment at a qualifying nursing facility.

  • The program applies to nursing facilities, not home health or hospice agencies. Its potential effect on home-based care hiring is a labor-market consideration, not a guaranteed outcome.

  • Funding comes from civil monetary penalties collected from nursing homes, making this a targeted enforcement-funded workforce program.

  • Starting in 2028, states must report certain Medicaid payment and compensation information to CMS by nursing facility. The requirement does not currently apply to home health or hospice.

  • The HHS Office of Inspector General found that states and some nursing homes faced practical difficulties collecting and reporting cost data. Home-based care owners can use that as a prompt to check their own reporting readiness.

What the Nurses for Nursing Homes initiative offers

CMS and the states have launched a program intended to support more than 4,000 nurses and nursing students, with particular focus on rural communities and areas facing workforce shortages. Under the program, eligible registered nurses and licensed practical or vocational nurses may receive up to $40,000 in student loan repayment and/or a $10,000 stipend for a three-year commitment at a qualifying facility.

The Healthcare Innovation report on the initiative says CMS is contributing $100 million and states are committing at least $175 million. The program is funded through civil monetary penalties collected from nursing homes.

Eligibility also depends on licensing and other program requirements. The initiative is specific to nursing facilities. Home health and hospice agencies cannot apply for these incentives through this program.

Why home health and hospice owners should pay attention

The initiative may change what some nursing facilities can offer eligible RNs and LPNs/LVNs. A three-year commitment paired with loan repayment or a stipend could be attractive to a clinician weighing employment options. That is a recruitment consideration for home-based care operators, not proof that facilities will draw nurses away from home health or hospice.

Nurses consider career options in a nursing facility and home care.
Nurses consider career options in a nursing facility and home care.

The same clinicians may be weighing different schedules, caseloads, travel expectations, supervision, benefits, and career paths. The practical question for an owner is not whether to match a particular incentive. It is whether your agency understands what candidates value and can explain its own offer clearly.

Start with a local view:

  • Map which nursing facilities and other care employers recruit from the same geographic labor pool.

  • Review your compensation positioning, including benefits, scheduling, travel time, and professional support.

  • Look at exit-interview data and turnover patterns. Are departures concentrated in a particular role, location, or manager?

  • Understand what competing facilities can now offer. Because this initiative is tied to qualifying facilities, referring a clinician to the program is not a recruitment lever for your agency.

For example, consider a composite agency owner who is struggling to fill a field nurse role. Instead of assuming that pay alone is the issue, the owner reviews recent departures and learns that unpredictable schedules and long travel distances are recurring concerns. The program announcement does not explain those departures, but it reinforces the value of understanding the full employment offer candidates are comparing.

The OIG audit and the 2028 reporting requirement

A separate development concerns financial reporting, not nurse incentives. The HHS Office of Inspector General report says that beginning in 2028, states must report annually to CMS, by facility, the percentage of Medicaid payments spent on compensation for direct care workers and support staff for services provided by Medicaid-certified nursing facilities.

This payment transparency requirement is not a federal minimum-spending rule. The OIG report says there was no federal minimum spending requirement as of its review. As of January 2026, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania had each established their own nursing home minimum spending requirements related to resident care.

The four states did not use one uniform approach. Each required nursing homes to spend at least a set percentage of revenues, expenses, or costs on resident care, calculating that percentage with different financial figures. Three states reported implementation challenges, including difficulty collecting information from nursing homes and a lack of audited data. Some selected nursing homes in all four states also faced challenges, including staffing shortages and difficulty gathering and reporting information within the available time.

These are findings about specific states and nursing facilities. They do not establish a nationwide minimum-spending mandate, and they do not mean home health or hospice agencies are subject to the 2028 nursing facility reporting requirement.

What this may preview for home-based care

There is no proposal in these sources to extend the nursing facility reporting requirement to home health or hospice. Any such extension is speculative and unproposed.

The useful lesson is narrower: regulators are building facility-level processes for collecting and reviewing detailed payment and compensation information. If a home health or hospice agency cannot reliably explain its costs by payer, service line, and workforce category, that can make internal decisions and buyer diligence harder, even without a new reporting rule.

This is also relevant to the broader industry discussion about Medicaid HCBS cost reporting. The OIG report itself concerns nursing facilities only, but the operational question for owners is similar: can your systems produce accurate, timely, and supportable cost information when someone asks?

An agency leader organizes staffing and cost information.
An agency leader organizes staffing and cost information.
What a buyer may examine

A buyer evaluating a home health or hospice agency will want to understand whether its staffing model is stable and financially supportable. Relevant questions may include:

  • How quickly can the agency fill open clinical roles?

  • What are turnover and vacancy patterns by job type and service area?

  • Are compensation costs consistently captured and reconciled?

  • Can management explain margin differences by payer or service line?

  • Does the agency depend heavily on one owner or key employee to recruit and retain staff?

This type of evidence can help a buyer assess operational risk. It does not guarantee a particular sale price or EBITDA multiple.

For illustration only, an agency with $650,000 in normalized EBITDA would be valued at $3.25 million at 5.0 times EBITDA. At 4.5 times EBITDA, the illustrative value would be $2.925 million, a $325,000 difference. These are example calculations, not market quotes or a forecast of what an agency will sell for. Workforce stability and credible financial records are among the factors a buyer may consider when underwriting a transaction.

An owner and buyer review workforce and financial diligence information.
An owner and buyer review workforce and financial diligence information.
What owners can do now
  • Map where your RN and LPN/LVN recruitment competes with nursing facility offers.

  • Document pay bands, benefits, vacancies, and turnover by role and location.

  • Check whether you can produce cost data by payer and service line today.

  • Track minimum-spending developments in your state, while distinguishing state rules from federal reporting requirements.

  • Monitor whether any proposal is made to apply similar reporting to home health or hospice. No such proposal is described in the sources cited here.

Plain-Language Glossary
  • Civil monetary penalty: A financial penalty collected for a violation of applicable requirements.

  • LPN/LVN: Licensed practical nurse or licensed vocational nurse. The title varies by state.

  • Minimum spending requirement: A rule requiring a provider to spend at least a specified share of certain revenues, expenses, or costs on a defined purpose.

  • Payment transparency reporting: Reporting that shows how payments are allocated or spent. In this case, it applies to specified Medicaid payments for nursing facilities.

  • Medicaid-certified nursing facility: A nursing facility certified to provide services under the Medicaid program.

  • EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

  • Normalized EBITDA: EBITDA adjusted to better represent ongoing business operations, excluding items that are unusual or not expected to recur.

  • Multiple: A factor applied to a financial measure, such as EBITDA, to illustrate or assess business value.

So what should you do now?
  • Review your local clinical labor market and learn what competing facilities can offer.

  • Use turnover and exit-interview information to identify retention issues you can address.

  • Test whether your systems can support payer-level and service-line cost analysis.

  • Keep regulatory monitoring precise: the new reporting requirement discussed here applies to nursing facilities, not home health or hospice.

Explore a sale or partnership

Senate Healthcare LLC is the buyer and strategic partner pursuing home health or hospice agency acquisitions. We are not a broker or advisor. Your agency does not need to be perfectly positioned today to have a confidential conversation with us about a potential sale or partnership, with a focus on reducing transition risk and supporting a thoughtful outcome.

Unlock Your 30-Minute Agency Succession Review

Maybe you're ready to expand your reach, or perhaps it's time to consider your legacy and the future of your business. Either way, it all begins with a conversation. Schedule a confidential, no-obligation call to explore what the future might hold for you and your business.

Complete the form, and we'll reach out for a chat...

© 2025 SENATE HEALTHCARE LLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED