7 Hospice Compliance Mistakes You're Making (and How to Fix Them Before Your Next Audit)

Hospice compliance mistakes are costing agency owners hundreds of thousands in recoupments and slashing exit multiples during buyer due diligence. This guide reveals the seven most damaging errors auditors target in 2026 and provides owner-level fixes you can implement in 90 days. If you are considering a sale or aggressive growth, your compliance posture directly impacts your valuation. Learn what clean compliance is worth and how to get there before your next audit.

1/15/20266 min read

This post covers the seven most costly compliance mistakes hospice agency owners make before audits and how to fix each one to protect your valuation, avoid recoupments, and position your agency for a successful exit or aggressive growth.

Quick-Scan Summary for Owners
  • Compliance failures can reduce your exit multiple by 10-20% during buyer due diligence

  • A single audit finding on a $3M agency can trigger $150K-$400K in recoupments

  • Terminal diagnosis coding errors are the #1 audit target in 2026

  • Documentation gaps create immediate red flags for private equity buyers

  • Agencies with clean compliance records command 15-25% valuation premiums

  • Your 90-day fix window before an audit can save six figures in penalties

Who This Is For

If you are a hospice or home health owner considering a sale, recapitalization, or aggressive growth over the next 12 to 24 months, this article is for you. Compliance is no longer just an operational checkbox. It is a direct lever on your EBITDA, your exit multiple, and whether buyers see your agency as an asset or a liability.

Buyers conducting due diligence in 2026 are scrutinizing compliance history harder than ever. One preventable audit finding can delay your deal by months or knock hundreds of thousands off your sale price. Here are the seven mistakes you need to fix now.

Mistake #1: Incorrect Terminal Diagnosis Coding

What owners get wrong: Using non-specific ICD-10-CM codes, listing symptom codes as the primary diagnosis, or utilizing prohibited Z-codes as principal diagnoses.

The financial impact: Improper terminal diagnosis coding is the top trigger for Medicare audits. A $4M hospice that faced a targeted probe review lost $280K in recoupments because 40% of claims used symptom codes instead of definitive diagnoses.

How to fix it:

  • Ensure the attending physician or hospice medical director certifies the terminal diagnosis

  • Use the most specific ICD-10-CM code available

  • Implement pre-submission audits to catch errors before claims go out

  • Train clinical and coding staff quarterly on current coding guidelines

Senate Healthcare blog header featuring hospice compliance audit preparation guide for agency owners
Senate Healthcare blog header featuring hospice compliance audit preparation guide for agency owners
Mistake #2: Failing to Code Related Conditions

What owners get wrong: Listing only the terminal condition on the Plan of Care while omitting co-existing conditions that impact the patient's care.

The financial impact: Missing related diagnoses leads to undercoding, which reduces your per-patient reimbursement and creates documentation inconsistencies that auditors flag. Over a 12-month period, this can represent $50K-$120K in lost revenue for a mid-sized agency.

How to fix it:

  • Conduct thorough reviews of each patient's complete medical history at admission

  • Include all clinically significant diagnoses on hospice claims

  • Establish clear communication workflows between clinical teams and coding staff

  • Use EHR systems that prompt for related conditions during documentation

Mistake #3: Misusing Combination Codes

What owners get wrong: Separately coding conditions that ICD-10-CM guidelines require to be reported with a single combination code, especially for hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure.

The financial impact: This error creates immediate audit vulnerability. Auditors view combination code misuse as a sign of inadequate compliance infrastructure, which directly impacts buyer confidence during due diligence.

How to fix it:

  • Invest in coding software that flags combination code opportunities

  • Provide ongoing staff education specific to hospice combination codes

  • Conduct monthly internal audits before claim submission

  • Document your compliance process for buyer due diligence packages

Mistake #4: Improper Code Sequencing

What owners get wrong: Listing a related condition as the primary diagnosis instead of the terminal illness, or incorrectly sequencing primary and secondary cancer codes.

The financial impact: Sequencing errors are a major red flag in MAC audits. One $5M hospice owner preparing for sale discovered that 25% of claims had sequencing issues, which delayed their transaction by four months while they remediated the problem.

How to fix it:

  • Always list the terminal diagnosis as the primary diagnosis on all hospice claims

  • Follow ICD-10-CM guidelines precisely for sequencing specific conditions

  • Implement quality assurance checkpoints before every claim submission

  • Train staff on hospice-specific sequencing scenarios quarterly

Hospice medical coding specialist reviewing ICD-10-CM terminal diagnosis codes on computer screen fo
Hospice medical coding specialist reviewing ICD-10-CM terminal diagnosis codes on computer screen fo
Mistake #5: Inconsistent Diagnosis Coding Across Documentation

What owners get wrong: Creating discrepancies between diagnoses listed on the Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI), care plan, and UB-04 claim form.

The financial impact: Inconsistencies are audit magnets. When buyers review your compliance history, documentation discrepancies signal operational chaos. This alone can reduce your valuation multiple by 10-15%.

How to fix it:

  • Implement a standardized process to ensure consistency across all documentation

  • Cross-check the primary terminal diagnosis across CTI, care plan, and claim form for every patient

  • Utilize EHR systems that automatically populate diagnoses across documents

  • Establish clear communication channels between clinical staff, coders, and billing personnel

Mistake #6: Documentation and Medical Necessity Gaps

What owners get wrong: Providing incomplete documentation that fails to justify services or demonstrate why specialized hospice care was medically necessary.

The financial impact: Medical necessity gaps are the second most common reason for claim denials and recoupments. For agencies with $3M-$7M in annual revenue, this can represent $100K-$300K in annual exposure.

How to fix it:

  • Create comprehensive, standardized documentation policies specific to hospice care

  • Ensure all records clearly demonstrate medical necessity beyond simply stating a service was provided

  • Train clinicians to document the "why" behind every intervention

  • Review documentation standards as part of your exit readiness preparation

For more on positioning your agency for due diligence, see our guide on succession planning as a strategic advantage.

Mistake #7: Medication Errors and Administration Issues

What owners get wrong: Failing to properly administer prescribed doses due to miscommunication, using incorrect drug selections, improper dosages, or omitting doses.

The financial impact: Beyond patient safety concerns, medication errors create liability exposure that sophisticated buyers factor into their risk assessment. Agencies with documented medication administration issues see valuation discounts of 5-10%.

How to fix it:

  • Integrate electronic medication administration records (eMAR) into your digital hospice systems

  • Establish structured workflows with clear delegation of responsibilities

  • Maintain consistent team communication protocols

  • Conduct regular audits of medication practices and document corrective actions

Owner Mini-Examples: What Compliance Failures Cost Real Agencies

Case 1: The $4.2M Hospice That Lost $320K
A Midwest hospice owner preparing for a 2025 exit discovered during pre-sale due diligence that 35% of claims had terminal diagnosis coding errors. The buyer's legal team flagged potential recoupment exposure of $320K. The deal closed, but the owner accepted a 12% reduction in sale price to cover the buyer's risk.

Case 2: The $6M Agency That Added 18% to Their Multiple
A Southeast hospice owner invested $45K in a 90-day compliance remediation program before going to market. They implemented standardized coding workflows, EHR consistency checks, and quarterly internal audits. When buyers reviewed their compliance history, the clean record commanded an 18% valuation premium over comparable agencies with audit findings.

Healthcare compliance audit checklist document with quality assurance checkpoints for hospice claim
Healthcare compliance audit checklist document with quality assurance checkpoints for hospice claim
Owner Self-Assessment: Compliance Readiness Scorecard
Hospice agency owner reviewing compliance readiness scorecard and valuation impact data on tablet de
Hospice agency owner reviewing compliance readiness scorecard and valuation impact data on tablet de
Glossary for Owners
  • CTI (Certificate of Terminal Illness): The physician certification required to establish hospice eligibility

  • ICD-10-CM: The current diagnosis coding system required for all Medicare hospice claims

  • MAC (Medicare Administrative Contractor): The regional entities that process and audit Medicare claims

  • Recoupment: Money Medicare recovers from providers after determining claims were improperly paid

  • UB-04: The standard claim form used for institutional hospice billing

  • EBITDA: Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, the primary metric buyers use to value your agency

Valuation Impact: What Clean Compliance Is Worth

Agencies with documented compliance programs and clean audit histories command measurable valuation premiums:

  • 15-20% premium for agencies with no audit findings in the past 24 months

  • 18-25% premium for agencies with documented internal audit processes and staff training programs

  • 10-15% discount for agencies with active recoupment exposure or unresolved audit findings

For more on maximizing your exit value, explore our insights on legacy planning and exit value optimization.

Your 90-Day Compliance Fix: Owner Priorities

Days 1-30: Conduct a comprehensive internal audit of coding accuracy and documentation consistency across all active patients.

Days 31-60: Implement standardized workflows for diagnosis coding, cross-document consistency, and medical necessity documentation.

Days 61-90: Train all clinical and coding staff, document your compliance infrastructure, and prepare your due diligence package.

Next Step for Owners

If your hospice agency generates $2M-$10M in annual revenue and you are considering a sale, recapitalization, or aggressive growth in the next 12-24 months, compliance readiness is non-negotiable.

Schedule a healthcare partnership consultation to evaluate your compliance posture, identify audit exposure, and position your agency to command premium valuation multiples.